Parity in the Salary Cap Era?
One of Gary Bettman’s key defenses of the salary cap, other than financial stability of the league, is the parity it provides. Sure, in the four years of the salary cap era, we have see at least three different Stanley Cup winners, four if Pittsburgh can win this year. But does four different Cup winners mean parity? Parity should be defined as the overall competitiveness of the league. This isn’t football, where you can see defending champions miss the playoffs and not be all that surprised. Nor is this baseball, where teams can throw buckets of money at players to sign them. Hockey is unique in that you have to develop your own talent, and be able to keep that talent around, and then fill in the holes with free agents. The exception to this rule is the 2005-2006 Rangers, who did the exact opposite, but still made the playoffs. So how much parity is there in the “new” NHL? Let’s break it down by playoff appearances by the years:
- 2006:
- Edmonton/Carolina finals, Carolina wins.
- 2007:
- 5 new teams (3 East, 2 West), teams that didn’t make the playoffs in the salary cap era, make the playoffs.
- Anaheim/Ottawa finals, Anaheim wins.
- Neither Edmonton nor Carolina qualify for the playoffs.
- 2008:
- 2 new teams (2 East, 0 West) make the playoffs.
- Detroit/Pittsburgh finals, Detroit wins.
- Both Anaheim and Ottawa qualify, but lose in the first round.
- 2009:
- 3 new teams (0 East, 3 West) make the playoffs.
- Detroit/Pittsburgh finals, again.
So of the 30 NHL teams, 26 have made the playoffs at least once in the salary cap era. The four that haven’t: Florida, Toronto, Phoenix, Los Angeles.
But what does all that mean?
It means that, believe it or not, there is some parity in the NHL. Sure, you have the powerhouses that always make the playoffs (Detroit, San Jose, etc), but for the most part, the playoff bound teams have changed from year to year.
Looking forward, you can expect Chicago, Detroit, San Jose, Washington and Pittsburgh to continue making the playoffs, and get high seeds. These are teams with a core of young players under contract for a while. Past that, it’s a bit of a crap shoot. But hey, for now, it looks like the salary cap era, minus the inconsistent officiating, is a success.


