Idiot’s guide to Power Play strategies

Over the last couple of weeks we’ve been discussing the different aspects of hockey systems, their strengths, their weaknesses, and the key differences between them. To date, we have mostly covered 5 on 5 play.

In the first post we talked about the five most common forechecking tactics, which is what teams will do when they don’t have possession of the puck. Last week we talked about dump & chase vs. regrouping, which are strategies employed when you do have the puck. Today we are going to talk special teams, specifically power play strategies.

In today’s NHL, there are basically four different types of power play strategies that are utilized; they are the Umbrella, the Overload, the 1-3-1, and the Spread. While these strategies are distinctly different, teams will sometimes rotate these on the fly to create defensive miscues.

The Umbrella:

As you can see in the image, the Umbrella sets up three players high near the blueline forming a high triangle and two players low in the slot parallel to the goal line.

The idea here is to get the puck to the middle of the ice for hard blasts from the point. Secondary objectives include passing options at the half-boards or to one of the other point players for shots. The responsibilities of the low players are to set up screens/deflections and to get to the net for rebounds.

What I like about this strategy is that it aims to outnumber penalty killers in the high slot. This theoretically should give our defensemen and the high forward a chance to keep the puck in the zone and prevent the other team from shorthanded breaks.

More after the jump…

The Overload:

Another common power play used in the NHL is the Overload. This is the main setup we saw during the Jagr/Renney years and is often used by other skilled (aka “finesse”) teams like the Redwings, Blackhawks, and Canucks.

As you can see from the image, the Overload aims to outnumber the other team along the half boards, thus creating a lot of three on two scenarios. The idea is to constantly cycle the puck and create a lot of movement down low, which causes defensive breakdowns.

The play usually starts along the half boards. One forward supports from below the goal line on the strong side and the other forward gets open in the mid slot on the weak side. The defensemen support from the blue line.

The problem with this setup, as we saw during the Renney/Jagr years, is that the emphasis is to create quality scoring chances and not as many shots on net as possible.  If you can’t get that flow going, the result is little to no shots and fans lose their patience. Remember yelling, “shoooooooot!”

The 1-3-1:

The 1-3-1 Power Play is a strategy that started in Europe, but is going to become the next big thing in the NHL real soon. Last season the Lightning were the first to really showcase it consistently in the NHL.

As you can see from this image, this strategy creates four triangles to pass around and take one-timer shots from. This system forces the defense to focus on the middle players causing the PK to shrink. As a result, it can be very, very effective.

The problem with the 1-3-1 is that every player must be extremely skilled with the puck. With only one player at the blueline, you’re also leaving the defense completely exposed. The Lightning are able to pull it off because they have a bevy of elite attackers who can pressure the puck and can back check like hell if there is a turnover on the blueline.

The Spread:

The last strategy is the Spread (or the 2-1-2) setup.  The aim of the Spread is to overrun the slot with forwards and outnumber penalty killers down low.

This setup creates problems for the PK because it causes point players to abandon defending the blueline, which allows your d-men to come in for one-timers. On the other hand, if a penalty killer moves to defend a point player, then it can leave someone open in the slot for a backdoor play.

The Spread is typically used in 5 on 3 scenarios, but some teams with bigger powerforwards use this setup on 5 on 4’s since they can outmuscle defenders in the slot.

So that’s power plays in a nutshell. Next up we’ll tackle penalty killing strategies.

 

  • By Walt, October 11, 2011 @ 9:12 am

    Can anyone tell me where Jesse Specter went? Thanks

    The Wrage Reply:

    Took a position with the Sporting News. Pat Leonard is his replacement at the Daily News.

    Walt Reply:

    Thanks

    He wrote well

  • By Matt J, October 11, 2011 @ 10:21 am

    I don’t know why but I always feel that setting up in the opponents DZ doesn’t work as mcuh as it should and most goals on the PP are scored by getting odd man rushes and crashing the net. Or maybe I watch too much NYR hockey. But I think the Rangers could run any of these PP systems except the Overload. We aren’t good enough to run that.

    The Suit Reply:

    For this team, I like the Umbrella and the Spread. I agree, I don’t think we have the skill level yet to Overload or 1-3-1.

  • By becky, October 11, 2011 @ 10:26 am

    Are there any lines that the Rangers can use the 1-3-1? I like it

    The Suit Reply:

    I don’t think our d-men can handle it. Too risky.

    Dave Reply:

    They can theoretically pull it off with Richards, Gaborik, Dubi, Del Zotto, and maybe Stepan/Cally/Wolski/Erixon. They have 4 pieces, not 5, so it’s tough to really pull that one off.

    We will mostly see an umbrella or an overload from them.

    becky Reply:

    Overload, while makes me happy because of the funny blue arrows, makes me cringe because I remember SHOOOOOOOOOOOT slash wanting to go on the ice and shoot the puck myself (or get murdered, I know, I won’t even pretend the game is easy)

    Dave Reply:

    The hope is that once Kreider comes on board, they can at least run the 1-3-1 for one unit, and the umbrella for the 2nd unit.

    The Suit Reply:

    MDZ has to take a major step forward if they are going to play the 1-3-1.

    Dave Reply:

    By the time Kreider is ready, it’s assumed that MDZ will have taken that step forward (in a perfect world).

  • By Mikeyyyy, October 11, 2011 @ 11:19 am

    What system does standing around and watching the puck fall into?

    The Suit Reply:

    All of them or none of them ;)

  • By Mikeyyyy, October 11, 2011 @ 4:10 pm

    To be honest. All our guys play scared. Torts has them about ready to shut themselves if they blow an assignment.

    Part of good hockey is flow. Even teams that crash the net have flow. Good teams rarely have players stopped and getting pucks passed to them. They are perpetually in motion. Very few stops and starts.

    It always seems (to me) that our boys in blue have to get the puck then start skating.

    So if I watch s game I see this. Behind the net dman waits. Then passes after a step. With no speed. Makes sure torts isn’t making faces at him. Forward gets the puck in the neutral zone. Stops. Passes to a guy standing. Makes sure torts isn’t making faces at him. Etc. Etc.

    When I was playing hockey. We alwaysmade sure that when we passed it was to a person in motion. You hit guys with passes that were streaking finding seams. It backed the d off you and forced play to the oppositions blue line.

    It just feels so forced right now.

    The Suit Reply:

    it’s early bro, back off the ledge!

    Mikeyyyy Reply:

    I’m just saying. They have 80 games to fix it. :)

Other links to this post