<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blue Seat Blogs &#187; Brandon Dubinsky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueseatblogs.com/tag/brandon-dubinsky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com</link>
	<description>In Gordie We Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rangers/Flyers Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/02/05/rangersflyers-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/02/05/rangersflyers-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Wrap-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artem Anisimov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrik Lundqvist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marian Gaborik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Del Zotto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McDonagh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a couple of days off, the Rangers took to the ice at the Garden for a pre-Superbowl matinee and threw the Flyers a well deserved 5-2 beating.  This was a tremendous game with a ton of talking points for analysis, but I’ll try to be brief.  Onto the bullets… Overall, the Rangers played an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a couple of days off, the Rangers took to the ice at the Garden for a pre-Superbowl matinee and threw the Flyers a well deserved 5-2 beating.  This was a tremendous game with a ton of talking points for analysis, but I’ll try to be brief.  Onto the bullets…</p>
<ul>
<li>Overall, the Rangers played an incredibly solid game today.  They minimized mistakes, took advantage of some soft goals by Ilya Bryzgalov and played a hard-nosed, physical game.</li>
<li>The offense was once again lead by Marian Gaborik.  He finished with a goal and an assist, a +3 and 8 shots on goal.  He was flying from the opening face-off and being reunited with Derek Stepan (2a, +3) and Artem Anisimov (1g, 2a, +3) yielded significant results.</li>
<li>Speaking of Anisimov, that tip was an absolute beauty off Girardi’s point shot.</li>
<li>Michael Del Zotto (Zaster?) continues to get stronger as the season progresses.  He is seeing open ice and making strong decisions when to join the rush.  His hockey sense has gone through the roof this season and it’s showing on both sides of the puck.</li>
<li>The Rangers got some timely secondary scoring with Fedotenko, Dubinsky and Del Zotto chipping in goals.  Hopefully Dubinsky’s game will continue to improve and take some of the pressure off Glen Sather to make a move for a top-6 forward at the deadline.</li>
<li>The PP continued to be ineffective, but there were plenty of signs of improvement in this game.  They began to force the puck toward the net from the points, which took some of the pressure off the wingers down low.  There were several lateral chances between the forwards as it forced the Flyer’s PK unit to operate a little higher in the D-zone.  10 PP shots on goal is a step in the right direction.</li>
<li>On the other side of the coin, six penalties is way too many to take even in a physical game like this one.  While Stu Bickel had a solid overall game, the interference and boarding penalties are going to keep Tort’s from trusting him with more ice time.  It was great to see him standing up and taking some of the fighting responsibilities off Prust and Rupp.</li>
<li>I continue to be impressed every game by Ryan McDonagh.  He is such a heady player and makes defending the top lines from every team look routine.  Once Staal rounds back into form (he looked much better again today) the Rangers will have an embarrassment of riches in the top-4.  Although they still lack the big bomb from the point, you have a puck mover (DZ) and three shut-down defenders who can chip in on offense more than occasionally.</li>
<li>I don’t know who has less business being on an NHL roster, Sestito or Rinaldo…</li>
<li>Another pedestrian performance by Brad Richards today.  He needs to step it up, and quickly.</li>
<li>The Rangers blocked an absurd amount of shots again today.  They had 25 blocks to the Flyer’s 10.</li>
<li>What else is left to say about Henrik Lundqvist’s play?  He only had 21 saves (mostly because of the 25 blocks), but man does that guy come up big when the team needs it the most.  Looks like he learned his lesson on Giroux (same move as the Winter Classic goal) with only a few minutes left.</li>
<li>Ilya Bryzgalov did not fair so well this afternoon.  His game was pretty much a microcosm of his entire season.  He had some tremendous saves, but was done in by three soft goals.  His save % in this game was .892, for the season, .899.</li>
<li>This team continues to find a way to win all types of games.  These intense, physical tilts are the best way to prepare for playoff hockey, and this team is making it clear they are going to be extremely difficult matchup to draw come April.</li>
</ul>
<p>Off tomorrow and another big division game against the Devils on Tuesday at the Garden.</p>
<p>Everyone be safe tonight and enjoy the <em>other </em>big game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/02/05/rangersflyers-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zuccarello Healthy; Can He Help Rangers Offense?</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/27/zuccarello-healthy-can-he-help-rangers-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/27/zuccarello-healthy-can-he-help-rangers-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State of the Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mats Zuccarello]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid the Rangers stumbling offense and the awful nine game losing streak the Whale find themselves in down in the AHL, perhaps unnoticed to many, is the pending return of Mats Zuccarello. Many have given up on the small Norwegian and depth has certainly helped pushed him back in to the AHL, but his talent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid the Rangers stumbling offense and the awful nine game losing streak the Whale find themselves in down in the AHL, perhaps unnoticed to many, is the pending return of Mats Zuccarello. Many have given up on the small Norwegian and depth has certainly helped pushed him back in to the AHL, but his talent and skill have never been doubted.</p>
<p>It just so happens that the Hobbit’s game doesn’t fit a checking style and he needs to be in a scoring role, but if the Rangers continue to be (at best) inconsistent offensively an opening could appear. So, should the undersized winger make a strong impression in the next week or so, could he become a candidate to help kick start the Rangers offense?</p>
<p>The skilled winger could have some success if paired with a passer like Richards and a hard hustling winger like Callahan, however, Zuccarello may not be able to influence his own future regardless of how impressive his AHL return is. There are players already in New York (Dubinsky, Anisimov, Richards among others) who, if they raise their game, would render the Zuccarello scenario moot. However, so long as the Rangers offense – and power play- remain underwhelming Zuccarello may be able to force himself back in to the equation.</p>
<p>Zuccarello shouldn’t be lacking for motivation. With his all star appearance in the AHL this weekend to look forward to ‘Zuke’ also knows that from the minute he gets back on to the ice, he’s playing for his Rangers and perhaps NHL future. He needs to show progress, desire and above all, production.</p>
<p>Can Zuccarello force himself back in to the equation? If he can show that he can play without the puck yes. If he can control and be effective on the powerplay for the Whale, yes. If Boyle, Dubinsky, Anisimov and (insert underwhelming forward’s name here) continue to shoot blanks, yes. There’s certainly an opportunity there for Zuccarello if he can make a quick impact in the AHL, but it goes without saying he’s running out of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/27/zuccarello-healthy-can-he-help-rangers-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do The Rangers Rely Too Much On Callahan?</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/25/do-the-rangers-rely-too-much-on-callahan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/25/do-the-rangers-rely-too-much-on-callahan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State of the Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Callahan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He sets the tone with his hustle and effort and leads with his desire and (growing) offensive ability, but do the Rangers rely too much on Ryan Callahan? It’s a worthwhile question, because during a period in which Callahan had been at his most ordinary (in a stretch prior to the Boston game) the Rangers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He sets the tone with his hustle and effort and leads with his desire and (growing) offensive ability, but do the Rangers rely too much on Ryan Callahan? It’s a worthwhile question, because during a period in which Callahan had been at his most ordinary (in a stretch prior to the Boston game) the Rangers went through their roughest patch since the start of the season. Coincidence?</p>
<p>Callahan has developed offensively to a point where he now literally does everything for the Rangers. He’s the team’s second most prolific goal scorer, he’s annually a league leader in hits, blocks countless of shots and plays in every single situation. We saw last year, when Callahan went down for an extended period of time, just how much the Rangers missed him. What is the remedy to the over reliance? Other players need to step up.</p>
<p>After a promising start to the campaign, more often than not Brad Richards has been a passenger. That is unacceptable for a man brought in to help lead the team to bigger things. Derek Stepan has cooled off considerably but, in all fairness, it’s too early to place too much pressure on the young sophomore. Brandon Dubinsky has been better but is clearly not the player this team needs him to be and then there are players such as Fedotenko and Brian Boyle who leave it all on the ice but at some point that is not enough. Anisimov? MIA.</p>
<p>It’s hard to be overly critical of a team that has the record the Rangers boast, however such is that record that the focus naturally switches to post-April potential. This Rangers team, without a better spread of production, cannot beat Boston over an extended series. If the Pens get healthy there’s a likelihood the Rangers struggle with their rivals in Pittsburgh as well.</p>
<p>With all due respect, when a solid journeyman like John Mitchell is one of your better players of late (3 points in 5) and you’re expecting too much from a talented but still rookie Carl Hagelin there’s an issue. If teams are able to shut down Marian Gaborik and then Ryan Callahan as well, Henrik Lundqvist has to be brilliant. It’s a good job he is just that.</p>
<p>Captain Cally is playing close to 21 minutes per game and given his style and reckless endeavour that’s possibly too much. Whether it’s through a transaction or changes in the line up several Rangers need to be better offensively. Not previously known for his offense (in the first instance) it may be a bad sign that the team is needing to rely on its heart and soul leader to score the big goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/25/do-the-rangers-rely-too-much-on-callahan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rangers/Bruins Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/21/rangersbruins-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/21/rangersbruins-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Wrap-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrik Lundqvist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marian Gaborik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Took all the way to game 46 for the Rangers and Bruins to finally collide, but what a game it was.  The Rangers bested the defending champs 3-2 in overtime on a goal by Marian Gaborik with 3.6 seconds remaining.  To the bullets… This one now makes 15 of the past 18 games these teams [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took all the way to game 46 for the Rangers and Bruins to finally collide, but what a game it was.  The Rangers bested the defending champs 3-2 in overtime on a goal by Marian Gaborik with 3.6 seconds remaining.  To the bullets…</p>
<ul>
<li>This one now makes 15 of the past 18 games these teams have played each other that has been decided by one goal.</li>
<li>This game was an incredibly physical one, as expected.  It seemed like Boyle was a Lucic-seeking missile every time he was on the ice, and pretty much everyone had that extra edge this afternoon.</li>
<li>Once the second period started, the offense began to come through.  4 of the 5 goals came in the second, and had McQuaid’s shot not deflected off of Brian Boyle’s stick, it could have easily been all the scoring.</li>
<li>Brandon Dubinsky was the one Ranger I felt really struggled in this one.  It seemed like he tried to do too much physically and got thrown off his game.  He missed his coverage on the Ference (more on him later) goal and seemed more or less lost in both ends of the ice.</li>
<li>I’m going to get all the critiques of the Rangers overall play out in this one bullet.  The power play looked god-awful again today.  If the last one was not a 4-on-3 for 5 minutes, it would have been another wasted opportunity.  I thought the Rangers turned the puck over far too many times at the top of the their defensive zone.  The Bruins point men did a nice job keeping clearing plays in, but too much through the middle and miscommunications on the breakout could have cost the Blueshirts a lot more than it did.  Lastly, they seemed a little soft in the slot area.  Boston does a great job of creating time and space in the offensive zone, but you have to clamp down.  But overall, they played a very solid game in both ends.</li>
<li>The heart and will that this team has blocking shots is really something isn’t it?</li>
<li>I fully believe that this game can be played perfectly.  It rarely happens, but you have to strive for it every single time you step on the ice.  I love that Torts has engrained that message in this team.</li>
<li>I thought Brad Richards played a much better game today.  He had an assist and 6 SOG.  Much more effective than he has been recently.</li>
<li>Marian Gaborik was obviously the star of the show today.  He had a tough assignment in Chara and managed to put 2 in the back of the net.  He stuck with the goal in overtime, putting the third rebound past Tuuka Rask for the game winner.</li>
<li>Good call on the musical chair line combos Suit…</li>
<li>Hank played his usual Vezina caliber game for the Rangers with 32 saves.  He is making all of the saves he needs to and a ton he has no business making.  He very much embodies the success of this team.  I thought Tuuka Rask played an exceptional game as well.  I believe that he is the better goalie in the Boston tandem and kept the Rangers from putting some distance between the teams in the middle of the second.</li>
<li>There was so much in this game that was worth discussing, but for the sake of keeping the length of the recap reasonable, I’ll close with this.  Ference’s hit on McDonagh was absolutely gutless.  I hope Shanny takes a good long look at this play.  Exactly the type of hit that needs to be removed from the game.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Rangers need to keep up the intensity from this tilt and prevent a let down game when they return home to host Winnipeg on Tuesday at 7pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/21/rangersbruins-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dubinsky To The Rescue?</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/17/dubinsky-to-the-rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/17/dubinsky-to-the-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State of the Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rangers paltry offense has been bailed out over the past 9 games (in which they scored a meagre 19 goals) by the stellar goaltending and the overachieving defense. With Marc Staal getting back to his usual game shape the recent dip in play by Stu Bickel (rookie, to be expected) can be compensated for. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rangers paltry offense has been bailed out over the past 9 games (in which they scored a meagre 19 goals) by the stellar goaltending and the overachieving defense. With Marc Staal getting back to his usual game shape the recent dip in play by Stu Bickel (rookie, to be expected) can be compensated for. However, it goes without saying that this offense needs to do more.</p>
<p>With the offense needing a shakeup it has perhaps shown just how important Brandon Dubinsky is to this team, a point which only emphasises the need for Dubinsky to play like he can. Prior to his shoulder injury Dubinsky was finding his feet. He had 8 points in his last 8 games, but more importantly he was playing physically, showing more confidence on the puck and above all making smarter decisions. If he can also improve his finishing when he returns (tonight?) the Rangers offense will get a huge lift.</p>
<p>All this brings us to Dubinsky’s opportunity. The Alaskan’s contract, ability and even future with the franchise has been questioned during a subpar season (and to an extent rightly so) but when he returns he has the chance to show that <em>he</em> can be the difference. Every team can have their star players but it is often those around them that make the difference; Dubinsky can be the Rangers difference maker.</p>
<p>The Rangers don’t possess anyone else like Dubinsky. His all-round skill set is unique. He can play physical, he is willing to fight all the while he can lead the rush and stick handle to a high standard. Dubinsky can play in every scenario and adjust to it. What he has never been able to show is an ability to do it for long stretches. Dubinsky now has the opportunity to help carry this team to an Atlantic division title.</p>
<p>Dubinsky can be the X factor on a team that has plenty of depth but not necessarily depth in the pure skill department. His presence can help create space for the likes of Gaborik and Richards and create matchup problems for the opposition. Dubinsky has a chance to make people forget about his subpar start and start to justify Glen Sather’s faith and his generous contract. Here’s hoping we’re all calling Dubinsky’s contract value for money come April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/17/dubinsky-to-the-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rangers Recent Form Exposes Key Players</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/16/rangers-recent-form-exposes-key-players/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/16/rangers-recent-form-exposes-key-players/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State of the Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artem Anisimov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marian Gaborik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rangers still lead the NHL in points, had a hugely impressive win in Toronto on Saturday and yet, the past week has really began to emphasise the Rangers’ necessity for their key players to step up offensively. No team can win purely on their defense. Even Lundqvist needs help from time to time. Marian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rangers still lead the NHL in points, had a hugely impressive win in Toronto on Saturday and yet, the past week has really began to emphasise the Rangers’ necessity for their key players to step up offensively. No team can win purely on their defense. Even Lundqvist needs help from time to time.</p>
<p>Marian Gaborik won’t get <em>too</em> much criticism around here just yet because he has still been the Rangers best offensive weapon and more often than not has been the catalyst – along with his line – for many victories this season. However Gaborik has been running on empty in the past few games much like how Brad Richards is in a hole, while Artem Anisimov has completely disappeared and even Ryan Callahan hasn’t been at his best.</p>
<p>This communal meander towards an offensive slump is terrible timing for the Rangers and only emphasises the absence of Brandon Dubinsky and places too much pressure on the young and overachieving defense. Coach Tortorella needs to find a solution to two offensive problems at the same time; the abysmal powerplay and the top six’s struggles. Given the talent at the coach’s disposal you would think one would answer the other.</p>
<p>One solution may be to remove Wolski from the line-up; he hasn’t added much and has detracted from the team first approach. However, whatever the coach tries in order to awaken his offensive weapons, it comes down to the players being responsible for their own play to change the worrying trend that’s beginning to emerge.</p>
<p>Brad Richards needs to be much better, both on the puck and going backwards. His line need to control the puck more efficiently and generate more scoring chances. However, whatever issue you think of it all comes back to the top six as two complete lines, as a unit, needing to be better. The Hagelin – Boyle led line cannot be the Rangers best line on a consistent basis.</p>
<p>The Rangers need more from the top six, plain and simple. They cannot expect to stay near the top of the conference without more from their offensive go-to-players. Looking at the teams atop the East, Boston is getting production from its key guys, Philadelphia is getting production from its key guys and with Alex Ovechkin finally waking up so too are the Capitals. If the Rangers want to keep pace someone needs to re-ignite this offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/16/rangers-recent-form-exposes-key-players/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kris Newbury Called Up</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/15/kris-newbury-called-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/15/kris-newbury-called-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call Ups/Send Downs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Newbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruslan Fedotenko]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rangers have called up Kris Newbury from the CT Whale. The call up is likely a precautionary move to replace Ruslan Fedotenko in the lineup, who left last night&#8217;s game with back spasms. Brandon Dubinsky is still a game time decision with his shoulder injury. If Dubi can play, then Newbury likely won&#8217;t  dress. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rangers have called up Kris Newbury from the CT Whale. The call up is likely a precautionary move to replace Ruslan Fedotenko in the lineup, who left last night&#8217;s game with back spasms.</p>
<p>Brandon Dubinsky is still a game time decision with his shoulder injury. If Dubi can play, then Newbury likely won&#8217;t  dress. If he can&#8217;t then expect to see Newbury slide into Fedotenko&#8217;s spot in the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/15/kris-newbury-called-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Day Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/12/game-day-musings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/12/game-day-musings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Prust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kreider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erik Christensen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Thursday. That means it’s almost the end of the week, obviously. It’s a game day and the Rangers are entertaining a surprising and in form Senators tonight. It should be an interesting one. Before today’s focus switches to the pre game build up, let’s saunter through a Musings together. The fact it’s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to Thursday. That means it’s almost the end of the week, obviously. It’s a game day and the Rangers are entertaining a surprising and in form Senators tonight. It should be an interesting one. Before today’s focus switches to the pre game build up, let’s saunter through a Musings together.</em></p>
<p>The fact it’s the Senators tonight brings me to mini rant time. No disrespect to the Senators (it could be any team) but it’s made an absolute farce of the All Star game that they have so many starters in the game. Fan involvement should somehow be incorporated but an All Star game should be the best players, most deserving players and true stars of the game not the likes of Daniel Alfredsson who is there mainly on popularity. Erik Karlsson deserves to go to the game but really, he leads <strong>all</strong> vote getters? Not right. The format needs to be changed to make the game meaningful or at least eagerly anticipated.</p>
<p>I did chuckle when I read Dion Phaneuf was voted the most overrated player in the league. It says a lot about his (lack of) popularity and standing in the game because he’s a lot better than people are giving him credit for. He’s a good defender who has found his game again this year. Somewhere in Connecticut, Sean Avery is smiling.</p>
<p>So, Stefan Matteau is draft eligible this summer. The USNTDP stand out is going to the QMJHL next season. Naturally, masses of Rangers fans will demand he be drafted regardless of whether he’s the right pick, at the time. Just like Beukeboom’s son who has already been traded and is having a mediocre OHL career. It’s not all about the surname &#8211; as Marcel Hossa and Fedor Fedorov will attest.</p>
<p>Ilya Kovalchuk is in great form and the Devils are winning games again. I couldn’t be happier for them. Really. They’re well on their way to becoming the Rangers circa 1997-2003. Not good enough for lottery picks (for a true rebuild) but good enough to be, at best, first round fodder. The Devils are in desperate need for another Adam Larsson or two to put around Kovalchuk. Enjoy mediocrity Jersey.</p>
<p>Recently quite a few Rangers players have cooled offensively making Dubinsky’s health (and relative return to form) that much more important. The Rangers can win close games, low scoring games and can live with the higher scoring teams but it’d be nice to see Anisimov, Stepan, Richards and even Gaborik to an extent start up some streaks again. Oh, and some consistent secondary scoring (Boyle etc) would be nice too.</p>
<ul>
<li>Best mid season defensive addition: Bickel, Stralman or Woywitka?</li>
</ul>
<p>What has happened to Brandon Prust this year? He’s simply not a factor consistently. His hit total is well down, shooting % well down on his career average and as a result he’s not getting the ice time. It’s a vicious circle but if he can get better (closer to last year) this team gets much deeper.</p>
<ul>
<li>Chris Kreider watch: 24 points in 21 games; goals in every kind of scenario – 3 game winners, 4 Power play tallies and a shorthanded goal.</li>
<li>Chris Thomas watch: 37 points in 29 games; 18 goals and 19 assists and a minus 3 rating. In his defence he’s on an at-best-average Oshawa team that is clearly gearing to the future. Thomas could really do with a big end to his season and great camp next year in NY. There’s a lot of competition for spots right now.</li>
</ul>
<p>I wonder if Steve Eminger has played his last game for the Rangers. Don’t forget he’s got another 6 weeks recovery and has to watch Bickel, Stralman and Woywitka fight it out for bottom pair jobs anyway. There’s a chance Sauer is back well before him too. He may get a conditioning assignment like Christensen and never see NY ice as a Ranger again. It’s a tough way to lose your job if it happens.</p>
<p>Question Time:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bigger disappointment: Brian Boyle or Brand Prust?</li>
<li>If one had to be cut loose: Woywitka, Bickel or Eminger?</li>
<li>Del Zotto season points total: Over or under 40?</li>
<li>Race to 20 goals: Hagelin or Dubinsky?</li>
</ul>
<p>We’ll end this edition of musings with a rare tip of the Broadway hat to Erik Christensen. He’s unlikely to ever play for the Rangers again but credit where it’s due for getting back on the ice with the Whale and looking to get sharp again. He’s an NHL quality player but simply put, can’t help this Rangers team. If he works his tail off in CT he may get a shot elsewhere. The Whale will hopefully benefit from a motivated, talented player.</p>
<p>P.S. Henrik For Vezina. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/12/game-day-musings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halfway There Report Card: The Top Six Forwards</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/11/halfway-there-report-card-the-top-six-forwards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/11/halfway-there-report-card-the-top-six-forwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artem Anisimov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek Stepan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marian Gaborik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Callahan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you’re a team sitting at the top of the NHL standings there’s usually not much to moan about. The Rangers have been blessed with production and top quality performances from all over the roster including the top six. A team cannot win consistently if it doesn’t get production from its key guys and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you’re a team sitting at the top of the NHL standings there’s usually not much to moan about. The Rangers have been blessed with production and top quality performances from all over the roster including the top six. A team cannot win consistently if it doesn’t get production from its key guys and the Rangers have been getting it. To the grades&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Marian Gaborik</strong>. In December <a href="http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2011/12/21/is-gaborik-leagues-best/">we discussed</a> the possibility of whether Gaborik was the league’s best right wing this season. That kind of says it all about the year he’s having. On pace to establish a new career high in goals, Gaborik is flirting with the magical 50 mark. Despite occasional stretches without production he’s been remarkably consistent and blew past his subpar 10/11 season goal total with less than half the season gone. Gaborik is the Rangers best offensive talent and he’s showing it. Fully healthy, he looks explosive; the sky’s the limit this season.<strong> A+</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ryan Callahan.</strong> The most underrated captain in the league? The best player in the league no one ever talks about? The Rangers captain does it all. He’s 4<sup>th</sup> in the league in hits, was on course for a 30 goal season and gives 100% every single shift. Seven power play goals, three game winners and a short-hander suggest Callahan produces in every scenario. If there was any kind of criticism of Callahan it may be that he’s taken a few too many penalties this season but that would be nitpicking in a brilliant season for the best Rangers captain in several seasons. <strong>A+</strong></p>
<p><strong>Brandon Dubinsky.</strong> This is a tough grade because it depends what your expectations are for the talented Alaskan. Dubinsky has had a pretty rough first half even though he’s clearly improved recently. The bottom line however is that for a player making around $4m annually, counted on to be an offensive contributor, a physical leader on a blue collar team then 5 goals and 21 points do not cut it. Nor does the 6% shooting percentage or the meagre 76 shots. Luckily for Dubinsky, the team has great depth and have coped without consistent production from him. Slowly turning his year around, it’s almost like a new addition making the Rangers potentially even more dangerous. <strong>C-</strong></p>
<p><strong>Derek Stepan.</strong> Please remember this kid is 21. He’s centering the top line on the NHL’s best team (points wise), is likely to comfortably surpass his rookie totals and doesn’t look out of place at all. Stepan was an eagerly anticipated prospect but I’m not sure many people thought he would be this good, this quickly. He still has some developing to do, like his shot selection, but when his contract expires he’ll likely be a lot better financially next time he signs on the dotted line. Stepan is scoring important goals (but not enough), playing a pivotal role in Gaborik’s bounce back year and is growing up right before our eyes. Rarely do you see Stepan make a bad decision and his passing ability is incredible, as we saw once again throughout the Coyotes win last night. A huge future lies ahead. <strong>B+</strong></p>
<p><strong>Artem Anisimov.</strong> The Russian is another player showing solid progression this year. Unfortunately he has cooled off lately; pointless in eight games. Anisimov has a tendency to be streaky, and he needs to score more goals but a lot of the work Anisimov has done this season has not shown up on the score board. He’s a nice fit on the top line with Gaborik and Stepan and has handled his move to the wing nicely. His play along the boards has improved immeasurably and don’t forget Anisimov is also still young at 23 and figures to have room to develop offensively. If his production ever catches up to his talent then he could be a monster. <strong>B-</strong></p>
<p><strong>Brad Richards</strong>. Like Dubinsky, critiquing Richards’ season so far depends on what your expectations were. If you judge Richards with the massive contract in mind or place much emphasis on the relatively small stretch where he wasn’t contributing offensively then it may not look that impressive. If you measure the impact his presence has had on the rest of the roster (depth), the clutch goal scoring or the way he has influenced players like Del Zotto then Richards has been a great addition and has had a fine beginning to his Rangers tenure. That said, one of the key reasons for his signing was to help fix the powerplay and he hasn’t managed to help turn it into a more effective unit.</p>
<p>Despite being on course for his first 30 goal season he’s also on course for his lowest points total since 08/09. Of course that total would have led the Rangers over the last few years but it’s a different measuring stick for an elite player. Richards’ faceoff results have been quite inconsistent this year too, much like his production. Richards has improved defensively as the year has developed which no doubt helps his game when not scoring. The best part of Richards’ year is that there should be more to come. Lined up with Callahan and Dubinsky, the Rangers now have two quality scoring lines. When was the last time they could say that? If Dubinsky really has turned his year around, expect more from Richards as a result too. <strong>B-</strong></p>
<p>In case you missed it. We also wrote report cards for our <a href="http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/10/mid-season-report-cards-the-bottom-six/">bottom six forwards</a>, <a href="http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/09/halfway-there-report-card-the-defense/">defense</a>, &amp; <a href="http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/09/halfway-there-report-card-the-goalies/">goalies</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/11/halfway-there-report-card-the-top-six-forwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rangers Steal One: Recap</title>
		<link>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/06/rangers-steal-one-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/06/rangers-steal-one-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Wrap-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Dubinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrik Lundqvist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan McDonagh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueseatblogs.com/?p=12288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rangers are really trying their best to eliminate the word lose from their vocabulary. The Rangers played an at best mediocre game. They lacked energy for the most part, lack cohesion and didn’t manage to sustain an offensive game. That said, this team has the best goalie in the league and has depth. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rangers are really trying their best to eliminate the word lose from their vocabulary. The Rangers played an at best mediocre game. They lacked energy for the most part, lack cohesion and didn’t manage to sustain an offensive game. That said, this team has the best goalie in the league and has depth. The team got key performances from individuals and worked hard to earn a lucky 3-1 victory. To the hits:</p>
<p><strong>Overall Game Comments</strong></p>
<p>The Rangers got dominated for three quarters of the first but had Lundqvist to thank again. On the back of Lundqvist the Rangers gained a foot hold toward the end of the period. Following strong play along the boards and a simple cross-ice toss by McDonagh &#8211; ably assisted by Dubinsky making a nuisance of himself in front -Richards banked home a rebound with Fleury out of position. Call the first period daylight robbery on the part of the Rangers and their Vezina goaltender.</p>
<p>The Rangers were caught out of position for the Pens goal. Following Boyle being taken down deep in the Pens zone a three on three became four Pens as Ben Lovejoy was trailing the play and was completely free right in front and gave Lundqvist no chance. Fedotenko was trying to get back in to the play but was well behind Lovejoy when it mattered. A breakdown by the Rangers cost them dearly</p>
<p>Credit Tortorella for calling an early timeout. It may not have initially had an obvious impact but the Rangers All Star coach takes action when he deems necessary and doesn’t just watch idly like some coaches.</p>
<p>Biggest issue in the first period was the Rangers inability to stop the Pens putting pucks on net, getting bodies to the net and creating havoc around Lundqvist. In short, they seemed to do whatever they wanted around the net other than score more than once.</p>
<p>The Rangers routinely failed to track the free man in their own zone and were caught chasing the puck several times. Given how dangerous James Neal is, it was worrying to see him alone near Lundqvist as the teams battled for the puck near the corner early on.</p>
<p>Early on, it seemed the gap between the Rangers forwards and their defense was too big. The first period in general was the Rangers worst in a very long time. However the score after one showed why this team is where they are: they simply don’t give up and keep themselves in games. The very definition of ‘difficult to beat’.</p>
<p>The Rangers scored a great shorthanded goal following a breakout from their own zone. Callahan showed excellent patience with the puck, making a nice drag-back and slid a simple pass to Dubinsky who tapped in. It was an eerily similar goal to one the Rangers scored in the same game by the same two players last season.</p>
<p>Much like in the Winter Classic, following initial dominance by the opposition, the Rangers raised their compete level, found their legs and looked faster beginning to win more battles along the boards which led to a few chances on Fleury.</p>
<p>Rangers had a two on one about eight minutes into the second. Once again it was Dubinsky and Callahan breaking in and this time Dubinsky, the puck carrier, elected to shoot. This is the type of play that drives people nuts about Dubinsky. He simply has to get that shot on net.</p>
<p>It was noteworthy to see Lundqvist hold on to so many shots and freeze the puck. Why? The Rangers were better on face-offs in the game. As obvious as it sounds, being remotely competent in the faceoff circle reduces the time the team is forced to spend in their own zone.</p>
<p>The third goal. It all started from the way McDonagh patiently tracked Kunitz round the Rangers goal and forced him to play the puck backwards. Gaborik chased the puck down, Fleury mishandled and Stepan followed up a Gaborik post shot to bank the puck in an empty net. Poor play from Fleury but great pressure from the Rangers.</p>
<p>The back tracking from the Rangers forwards vastly improved following the first period. Their neutral zone play – and the aforementioned gap between forwards and defense &#8211; was much better as the game progressed.</p>
<p><strong>Noteable Rangers</strong></p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">It’s almost pointless singling out Lundqvist for his play because he’s spectacular most nights and excellent every night. He made big stops, his positioning was excellent and his rebound control was solid. As noted on the MSG commentary his glove hand was especially brilliant tonight. James Neal (active throughout) found his master in the King.</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Ryan McDonagh had a slight mid-season dip in form but it’s behind him. He was a beast in this game. Involved offensively, solid as a rock defensively and equal to anything the Pens had. When he plays like this (which is often) you almost feel sorry for Montreal fans. Almost.</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Brandon Dubinsky played his best game of the season. He was physical (which he needs to be to be effective) and he was excellent offensively while he constantly went to the net. However there’s that shocking miss on the two on one.</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Marian Gaborik ended the night pointless but he was busy, dangerous and defensively responsible too. His work rate and defensive conscious are under-appreciated but he wouldn’t get so many offensive opportunities if he wasn’t working so hard.</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">A final tip of the Broadway Hat goes to Dan Girardi. Like Lundqvist it’s almost boring to praise the Rangers rock on the blueline but he went +3, and played great defense. Whether it is a block, cleverly negating an icing or his great positional play Girardi almost never makes a bad play. Immensely consistent.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Final Thought</strong></p>
<p><em>What else is there to say? This team keeps winning. It gets contributions from all over the roster and with Marc Staal getting better with each passing game this team has another top tier player on his way back to form. In recent years a win in Pittsburgh would require a great overall performance from the Rangers but this season they can beat elite teams without playing their best. Scary thought. I cannot wait to see how the Rangers measure up against Boston’s finest.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blueseatblogs.com/2012/01/06/rangers-steal-one-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

